<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>DSpace Collection:</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2549" />
  <subtitle />
  <id>http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2549</id>
  <updated>2026-04-03T13:25:57Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-04-03T13:25:57Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>An Investigation into the Nature and Treatment of Learning Difficulties of Distance Learners at Intermediate Level</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2647" />
    <author>
      <name>Masresha, Melaku</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2647</id>
    <updated>2017-01-02T11:55:52Z</updated>
    <published>2013-10-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: An Investigation into the Nature and Treatment of Learning Difficulties of Distance Learners at Intermediate Level
Authors: Masresha, Melaku
Abstract: The Study was aimed at identifying the learning difficulties faced by the distance learners of&#xD;
private higher education in Ethiopia at intermediate level and to explore the existing support&#xD;
provided by the higher education to its distance learners to overcome the learning difficulties&#xD;
emerged during self-study the textual materials and in completing assignments. The study was&#xD;
descriptive in nature’s it was mixed design study approach w e r e used for data collection a n d&#xD;
analysis. The population of the study consisted of two categories: the distance learners and the&#xD;
tutors. The sample for the quantitative part was comprised of 150 distance learners and 80 tutors&#xD;
using stratified and random sampling techniques. The qualitative phase includes the sample of 16&#xD;
distances learners represent in four compulsory courses enrolled in two privet higher education&#xD;
in 2012 at intermediate level. Likewise 10 tutors and two study centers in eastern Ethiopia were&#xD;
also drawn for the qualitative design. Data for the qualitative phase was collected by developing&#xD;
two questionnaires: one for the distance learners and second for the tutors.&#xD;
Statements; items were developed at 5-pointlikert scale, three point scales yes/no for m and open&#xD;
ended form besides, percentage and mean score, one sample t-test was employed to test the Five&#xD;
hypothesis of the study. For qualitative part interview were conducted of 16 distance learners&#xD;
and 10 tutors. An observation sheet was also prepared to observe student tutor intervention in&#xD;
resolving the learning difficulties the result revealed that the majority of distance learners faced&#xD;
difficulties in comprehending the modules due to multiplicity of concepts ordained in the&#xD;
sentences, lack of pro per illustration in the modules and lack of study skills the module materials&#xD;
was not supplemented with audio and video programs. Lack of time was also a hurdle for the&#xD;
distance learners as they had to study a lot of modules in short periods of one semester the&#xD;
difficulty in completing assignment were; the difficulties in making self notes during self studding&#xD;
the modular material, problems in organization of studied/read materials, hurdles in presenting&#xD;
critical analysis of the question and difficulties in summarizing the answers. Lastly the tutors&#xD;
role was also non cooperative as most of the tutors did not correct the wrong answers written by&#xD;
the students majority of tutors did not return checked assignment to their students in time. The&#xD;
study centers did not function properly and learning difficulties of distance learners were not&#xD;
properly treated at study centers through tutorial support and electronic media.</summary>
    <dc:date>2013-10-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Role of Competency Framework in Improving Quality Research Output in Distance Education: Lesson Derived from Practice</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2646" />
    <author>
      <name>Melaku, Getachew</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2646</id>
    <updated>2017-01-02T11:52:23Z</updated>
    <published>2013-10-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: The Role of Competency Framework in Improving Quality Research Output in Distance Education: Lesson Derived from Practice
Authors: Melaku, Getachew
Abstract: Research is an endeavor for improving theory and practices in different sectors. Researches&#xD;
are conducted following different approaches based on the kinds of research. The type of&#xD;
research, the purpose of the research, characteristics of the research participants, the scope&#xD;
of the research and the level of scientific rigor are among the factors that affect a research&#xD;
endeavor (Lodico, M ., Spaulding, D . and Voetgtle, K. 2006: 5).&#xD;
What so ever the case, conducting research requires relevant knowledge, skills and&#xD;
attitudinal dispositions. In this paper, I investigated and described the role of identifying the&#xD;
relevant competency framework towards facilitating the production of quality research in&#xD;
education. I took the practical experience of developing a research competency framework&#xD;
for the Ethiopian Civil Service University(ECSU). In my report, I summarized the steps and&#xD;
procedures followed towards the production, validation of competencies identified in&#xD;
knowledge skills and attitude aspects and sign of the research competency framework. I also&#xD;
highlighted the role of the competency framework in facilitating research practices in&#xD;
the university in general and in the Institute of Distance and Continuing Education in&#xD;
particular.</summary>
    <dc:date>2013-10-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>An Evaluation of the Status of Distance Education Program in Public and Private Higher Education Institutions at Mettu Centers: A Comparative Analysis on Quality Issues</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2645" />
    <author>
      <name>Beyessa, Feyera</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2645</id>
    <updated>2017-01-02T11:49:23Z</updated>
    <published>2013-10-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: An Evaluation of the Status of Distance Education Program in Public and Private Higher Education Institutions at Mettu Centers: A Comparative Analysis on Quality Issues
Authors: Beyessa, Feyera
Abstract: The central intention of this research was to evaluate the status of distance education program&#xD;
on quality issues of Higher Education Institutions (H EIs) [Public and Private H EIs] at Mettu&#xD;
town Centers, Ilu Abba Bora Zone. To attain this objective, comparative case study research&#xD;
method was employed. The subjects of the study were 11 3[1 00 students, 3 center coordinators&#xD;
and 10 tutors from both HE Is]. To select the target HE Is, availability sampling technique was&#xD;
used to select public H EI (Jim ma University/JU ), simple random sampling technique was&#xD;
employed to select the private HE Is (St. Mary’s University-College/SM U C and Rift Valley&#xD;
University-College/RVU C), stratified sampling followed by simple random sampling (lottery&#xD;
method) was used to select the students, and availability and purposive sampling techniques&#xD;
were employed to select center coordinators and tutors respectively. To gather the necessary&#xD;
data, questionnaire, interview, document analysis and observation checklist were used. The&#xD;
gathered data were analyzed using both qualitative and quantitative methods of data analysis.&#xD;
The result of the study showed that with statistically significant difference between the students’&#xD;
satisfaction about center coordinator services of JU and private HE Is, students of private HE Is&#xD;
were more satisfied than public H EI with totally no online registration service in both groups.&#xD;
Students at private H EIs were relatively at higher position in engaging tutorial session and&#xD;
teaching-learning process than JU . In both groups, the instructional interactions between tutees&#xD;
and tutors (part timer from anywhere) on tutorial session seems low with tutees who get little&#xD;
opportunity to discuss except on tutorial days. Concerning modules, quality of the modules of&#xD;
private H EIs looks more or less at better position than modules of JU . The study also shows that&#xD;
with statistically non-significant difference between the two groups, stagnantly both groups used&#xD;
very less technology based learning materials and instructional teaching-learning process,&#xD;
which inhabit the quality of distance education program. Evidence showed that students’&#xD;
assessments in both H EIs were only focused on assignment (30%) and final exam (70%), with&#xD;
poor instructional interaction and less transparency feed-back/evaluation system made by nontutors&#xD;
of the institutions, and the HEIs haven’t made progressive shift to the current instructional&#xD;
implementation. Assessment and evaluation techniques were given less emphasis to the student centered&#xD;
instructional methodology, which has considerably negative impact to the quality of&#xD;
Ethiopian H E Is of distance education program. Thus, based on the findings of the study,&#xD;
implications were pointed to mitigate the aforementioned problems.</summary>
    <dc:date>2013-10-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>An Investigation of Learners’ Satisfaction Level of Distance Education Teaching Material Preparation, Tutors’ Effectiveness and Student Support and their Predictive Power of Students’ Academic Achievement: The Case of Addis Ababa Center of Distance Division</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2643" />
    <author>
      <name>Getaye, Atlabachew</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2643</id>
    <updated>2017-01-12T08:24:56Z</updated>
    <published>2013-10-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: An Investigation of Learners’ Satisfaction Level of Distance Education Teaching Material Preparation, Tutors’ Effectiveness and Student Support and their Predictive Power of Students’ Academic Achievement: The Case of Addis Ababa Center of Distance Division
Authors: Getaye, Atlabachew
Abstract: F or a country like Ethiopia where higher learning enrollment is very low, distance education&#xD;
offers an ideal opportunity of access for the country in general and for the students in particular&#xD;
since it avoids time and place constraints. In spite of these merits, distance education requires&#xD;
care with regard to the quality of student support, tutoring and material preparation. Higher&#xD;
education institution needs to evaluate the status of the three determining factors time and again&#xD;
to alleviate factors which affect the quality of distance education and students achievement. If&#xD;
the quality of student support, tutoring and material preparation is high, it is assumed that&#xD;
students’ achievement would possibly be high. This research is conducted to investigate the&#xD;
satisfaction level of students about the quality of student support, tutoring and material&#xD;
preparation of Saint Mary’s Addis Ababa Center of distance division and the prediction power of&#xD;
the three factors on students’ achievement. It also tries to see if there is any difference in terms o&#xD;
f perception of quality from gender, department and year of study regarding tutors’, material&#xD;
preparation and student support effectiveness. The study employs a quantitative method, using&#xD;
questionnaire and document analysis. The findings reveal that students have high satisfaction&#xD;
regarding tutors effectiveness, quality of material preparation and student support. And tutors&#xD;
effectiveness, quality of material preparation and student support predict learners’ achievement.&#xD;
There is no a statistically significant difference regarding the three factors when it comes to&#xD;
department, but the study shows a statistically significant difference to year of study. Females&#xD;
appear more satisfied compared to males about tutors’ effectiveness, quality of material&#xD;
preparation and student support.</summary>
    <dc:date>2013-10-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

